• History FHartmann100 :

    • Efficiency rating
      1,814.82
      WN7
      1,911.08
      WN8
      3,171.12
    • Efficiency rating
      2,172.44
      WN7
      2,455.38
      WN8
      5,393.55
    • Efficiency rating
      1,943.18
      WN7
      2,199.89
      WN8
      4,147.75
    • Efficiency rating
      1,183.26
      WN7
      1,888.93
      WN8
      3,016.92
    • Efficiency rating
      1,041.28
      WN7
      1,325.37
      WN8
      1,944.83
    • Efficiency rating
      1,371.35
      WN7
      1,936.97
      WN8
      2,913.45
    • Efficiency rating
      939.27
      WN7
      1,540.46
      WN8
      812.13
    • Efficiency rating
      2,999.88
      WN7
      2,096.38
      WN8
      2,548.87
    • Efficiency rating
      1,675.04
      WN7
      1,875.45
      WN8
      2,734.35
    • Efficiency rating
      1,632.94
      WN7
      1,943.12
      WN8
      2,817.54
    • Efficiency rating
      1,564.28
      WN7
      1,852.54
      WN8
      2,958.91
    • Efficiency rating
      1,715.19
      WN7
      1,791.07
      WN8
      2,734.06
    • Efficiency rating
      1,324.03
      WN7
      1,724.01
      WN8
      1,743.57
    • Efficiency rating
      1,373.01
      WN7
      1,634.89
      WN8
      2,710.75
    • Efficiency rating
      1,392.76
      WN7
      1,682.34
      WN8
      2,434.14
    • Efficiency rating
      1,607.94
      WN7
      1,904.53
      WN8
      3,221.65
    • Efficiency rating
      1,625.7
      WN7
      1,724.07
      WN8
      2,872.73
    • Efficiency rating
      1,680.81
      WN7
      1,842.76
      WN8
      2,921.51
    • Efficiency rating
      1,395.87
      WN7
      1,713.83
      WN8
      2,629.38
    • Efficiency rating
      1,522.48
      WN7
      1,775.58
      WN8
      2,650.33
    • Efficiency rating
      1,578.95
      WN7
      1,689.63
      WN8
      2,564.68
    • Efficiency rating
      1,533.37
      WN7
      1,714.04
      WN8
      2,609.03